Judges & Voting
Learn about the voting process, voting criteria, and the judges that rate your games.
Voting Process
Once all submissions are gathered, all entries are verified to ensure that all necessary information is provided and that the rules stated in Rules & Guidelines and in the Medium article for the specific Game Jam are followed. The judges will then play through and rate the games over the course of 3 weeks.
Each game is played by all judges and scored the voting criteria below. The game's accumulated score allows judges to determine the top 10.
Each judge can also select up to 15 Honorable Mentions. Up to 10 experiences that are not part of the top 10 and were designated as Honorable Mention by the most of the judges will be then awarded an Honorable Mention prize.
Voting Criteria
Games are judged based on five categories, amounting to a maximum of 22 points per judge. The following voting categories are scored based on the following criteria:
Overall Creative Idea
This category is rated from a scale of 1-5 by each judge.
Originality / uniqueness of idea
Theme adherence
Level Design
This category is rated from a scale of 1-5 by each judge.
Game flow
Ensuring that areas cannot be accessed or skipped past unless intentional
Terraforming
Immersion (visual design & coherence)
Game Design
This category is rated from a scale of 1-5 by each judge.
Quality of logic design / mechanics
Fun and well balanced mechanics
Immersion (based on mechanics)
Narrative (applicable based on narrative’s importance in your game)
Level of replayability
Playability
This category is rated from a scale of 1-5 by each judge.
Intuitive gameplay
Severity of issues / bugs disrupting player experience
BONUS: Wow Factor
This category is a bonus point category rated from a scale of 0-2 by each judge.
Outstanding assets and artistic direction
Unique / innovative features
Outstanding atmosphere / immersion
Exceptional player experience
Judges
Game Jams have a total of 4 judges:
1 from The Council
3 from Trusted Partners
Judges will also prepare some feedback on the experiences they grade that will be sent by the Game Jam team afte the results are out.
Guest Judges from IPs may select an Experience for a special prize.
For each Game Jam, 3 external Trusted Partner judges will vote on the experiences submitted.
Trusted partners are creators that are selected for their skills with the Game Maker and have already published several experiences. Most of them have also already participated in Game Jams. Trusted Partners will rotate from one Game Jam to another.
Trusted Partners acting as judges, as well as directly related persons, cannot participate in the Game Jam they are judging.
The Council is an independent entity working closely with The Sandbox on tasks such as Quality Assessment of games published in our ecosystem. All judges from The Council thus have extensive experience in evaluating games and determining their strengths and weaknesses.
Guest IP's judges might select one experience for a special IP prize based on an IP fit. However, they do not influence the global ranking.
Last updated
Was this helpful?

